Can I study my culture?

Can I study my culture?

In the world of Inthology, it is primarily interested in many wonderful scientists, such as Mix Weber, Lewis Henry Morgan and Margaret Mood, and they are considered to be a father of Interologluology, Faroe Boss's father. Working as a guide, his collaboration laid the foundation for the study of many ideas, ideology and human culture. For example, one of the most incredible studies of Margaret Meat consists of a technique which mentions visual ideology, in which the formation of a medium study role in three different cultures: Baloni, Italy, and American. Personally, I like Margret Mate's method and since I had to know it, I have studied my previous work. During the first semester of my graduate study, I was glad to know those who gave me permission to study Orthopology. However, as I have learned from all classes of class-ulthologists and their wonderful contributions, they point out many things to me. First of all, there was no deep study of black orthopolopes, I was the only minority and three in attendance, as I attended the field work. I realized that there were very few minorities in the whole world and I wondered why. Is it associated with the first round of Orthopology due to scientific racism? Is it because the minorities feel incredible on earth or are not accepted? Or is it just that the minorities can not be exposed to orthopoly? Whatever is the reason, this may be a silent question that remains in the world of ideology.

Scientific racism


Do not make any mistake: Breeding was at the top of early orthopolysis, because it was prepared at a time when the next fashion statement was billed. Unfortunately, Orthopolology seems to be frustrated by some of these key ideas. Scientific racism trapped by various minorities in the early years of Orthopology can be very encouraged to learn without a heavy or sad heart. I have seen that almost everybody knows what happened during this period. For example, for the first time a teacher showed a movie about the human zoo, there was a strange feeling that took place after the room and a wide debate. The shock, pain and despair was at the level of discussion. The human zoo was present at the beginning of the 19th and early 20th century, as Socialists, Scientists and Scientists presented humans of different nations for fun purposes. The European people will ignore the world as if they were animals, and in some cases animals were grouped with animals compared to humans.

Is this an acceptance or exhibition?


Personally, I have never experienced any time when someone feels that I do not belong to the field, but there are definitely times when I feel that I did not have any opinion. Not as acceptable or valued as my white colleagues. However, I think these minorities face almost all the actions of some people who are involved in a mentally neutral state. It may be like this, in the field of orthopolysis, there is anxiety and acceptance. On one hand, the United Nations, who have studied Blax and other minorities permanently, has proven that they are less for their white successors and have no value in ideas of many other ideas in their lives. Is. Due to these strange studies of the minorities, many blacks did not accept Orthopology and chose to remove themselves from the process. Instead, the majority of African Americans came to such a likelihood for socialization and history when they continued their studies. The number of black orthopolysis was very few that in the early 1900s there were only ten black orthopologists. Today, the number of black orthropologists is far more than 10 people, but it is still relatively weak. Ethnic and cultural wars have helped to overcome some obstacles for the minorities, even though they have not yet fully established their connection with ethology. Then, why do I have to ask?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Europe Middle East

Iqbal's Opokirfa

Life in the living room